Legal Opinion

Melenson v. Howell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 7, 1939PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff had a verdict for $25,000. The trial court required aremittitur of $10,000, which was made, and final judgment was entered for $15,000. Defendant has appealed from this judgment.

[1] Plaintiff makes the contention "that defendant is in the same position on this record as if none of the points raised were mentioned in a motion for new trial." The basis of this claim is that, although defendant filed a timely motion for new trial, this went to the first judgment entered for $25,000, and that, when, after remittitur, a new judgment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Banks v. Morris CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Smithers v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Castorina v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Perkins v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Womack v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. King Smith v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. Teague v. Plaza Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Sanchez v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Evans v. Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API