Melenson v. Howell
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff had a verdict for $25,000. The trial court required aremittitur of $10,000, which was made, and final judgment was entered for $15,000. Defendant has appealed from this judgment.
[1] Plaintiff makes the contention "that defendant is in the same position on this record as if none of the points raised were mentioned in a motion for new trial." The basis of this claim is that, although defendant filed a timely motion for new trial, this went to the first judgment entered for $25,000, and that, when, after remittitur, a new judgment…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Banks v. Morris CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Smithers v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Castorina v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Perkins v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Womack v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- King Smith v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Teague v. Plaza Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Sanchez v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Evans v. Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.