Legal Opinion
Fitzsimmons v. Hale
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 4, 1915PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
These were two actions of tort. The first is brought to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff, and the second, brought by the husband of the first plaintiff, is to recover for amounts expended by him for medical attendance, medicines, and the nursing of his wife. Where the plaintiff is referred to it is to be understood as applying to the female plaintiff.
It is admitted by the defendant that shé was “in control of the building numbered 193 A Massachusetts Avenue” in Boston; that she "leased out certain numbers of said building numbered as aforesaid, and reserved to herself…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Looney v. McLeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Andrews v. WilliamsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Domenicis v. FleisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Wilcox v. ZaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Crowe v. BixbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Gallagher v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Donnelly v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Wynn v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Garland v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.