Henderson v. AT & T CORP.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KENT, District Judge.
This employment discrimination action was originally brought by five Plaintiffs, all female, who are employed by or were formerly employed by the Defendants (referred to together as AT & T) as sales persons in a small, distinct business organization within AT & T known as the Profile Initiative Program (PIP). The original Plaintiffs reside in five cities and four states, and worked in four separate AT & T offices located in three states. On March 19, 1996, the Court partially granted AT & T’s Motions to Sever and Transfer, and the claims of three of the original…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- Abecassis v. WyattDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Johnson v. Fluor Corp.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2016
- Snooks v. University of Houston, Clear LakeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- Wayne v. Dallas Morning NewsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.