Legal Opinion

Melick v. Dayton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On appeal from a decree of the chancellor, whose opinion is reported in Dayton v. Melick, 5 Stew. Eq. 670.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

Charles H. Dayton filed a bill to foreclose a mortgage given him by Peter W. Melick. The bond to secure which the mortgage was given, was for part payment of purchase-money of a mill-seat and tract of land, which Dayton conveyed to Melick.

Melick admits the execution of the bond and mortgage, but alleges he does not owe thereon as large a sum as is demanded in the bill of complaint.

He insists, first, that Dayton has not given him credit for all the payments he has made on the bond; and, secondly, that Dayton, at the time of the sale,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mann v. PearsonNew York Supreme Court · 1806

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StevensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  2. Curtiss-Warner Corp. v. ThirkettleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. Levine v. Lafayette Building Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  4. Feinberg v. RowanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  5. Harris v. MillowayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API