Legal Opinion

Liddell v. Slocum-Dickson Medical Group, P. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained by Sally J. Liddell (plaintiff) as the result of a venipuncture performed by defendant Louanne Apel, a phlebotomist employed by defendant Slocum-Dickson Medical Group, P. C. (Slocum-Dickson). Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action, alleging that Slocum-Dickson was negligent in hiring and supervising Apel. Because Apel was acting within the scope of her employment when plaintiff was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Karoon v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Eifert v. BushNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Weinberg v. Guttman Breast & Diagnostic InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Eifert v. BushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ashley v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Trader v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Perkins v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API