Liddell v. Slocum-Dickson Medical Group, P. C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained by Sally J. Liddell (plaintiff) as the result of a venipuncture performed by defendant Louanne Apel, a phlebotomist employed by defendant Slocum-Dickson Medical Group, P. C. (Slocum-Dickson). Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action, alleging that Slocum-Dickson was negligent in hiring and supervising Apel. Because Apel was acting within the scope of her employment when plaintiff was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Karoon v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Eifert v. BushNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Weinberg v. Guttman Breast & Diagnostic InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Eifert v. BushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ashley v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Trader v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Perkins v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009