Horticultural Development Co. v. Lark
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
By the bill in this case the complainant seeks, through equitable attachment, to subject to the satisfaction of its alleged claim, the alleged equitable interest of the defendant in a ten-acre tract of land located in the county of Mobile, which the defendant agreed to purchase from the complainant at and for the sum of $12,000.
The bill alleges that the purchase money has been paid in full by the defendant; that a deed to the same has been tendered to him, which he has refused to accept.
The bill further avers that in said contract “it was agreed that the complainant should cultivate and care…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ould v. Washington Hospital for FoundlingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Grayson v. MuckleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Lyons v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Mobile Electric Co. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Prowell v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stratford v. LattimerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Dozier v. Troy Drive-In-Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- First Huntington National Bank v. Gideon-Broh Realty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
- Dorado Ltd. Partnership v. Broadneck Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Wright v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.