Legal Opinion

Dorado Ltd. Partnership v. Broadneck Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 1989No. 141, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

This case involves the question of whether a contract for the sale of land, under which title may not be transferred until an indefinite date, is enforceable. Because the buyer’s interest may vest too remotely, we hold that the contract in the case at bar violates the Rule Against Perpetuities.

On June 23,1981, Dorado Limited Partnership and Broad-neck Development Company entered into a contract to sell real property located in Anne Arundel County. Under the contract Broadneck agreed to sell 70 lots to Dorado for $280,000. In addition, Broadneck granted Dorado an option to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ferrero Construction Co. v. Dennis Rourke Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Ryland Group, Inc. v. WillsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. Chism v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Rodin v. MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Curtis v. Maryland Baptist Union Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arundel Corp. v. MarieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Ayres v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Selig v. State Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Park Station Ltd. Partnership, LLLP v. BosseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Stewart v. TuliCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API