Legal Opinion

Monitor Stove Co. v. Williamson Heater Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1924No. Nos. 3916, 3943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.

No. 3916 is an appeal by plaintiffs from a decree of the District Court adjudging patent No. 1,002,776, issued September 5, 1911, to S. D. Strong, and claim 2 of patent No. I, 346,801, issued July 3, 1920, to the Monitor Stove & Range Company, of Cincinnati, Ohio, assignee of Wm. J. Doyle and Justus J. Wollenhaupt, invalid for lack of novelty and invention, and dismissing the bill of complaint charging appellees with infringement. Both of these patents relate to hot-air furnaces.

It is claimed that this opinion of the trial court is inconsistent, in that it finds that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. EamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. United States Rifle & Cartridge Co. v. Whitney Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Lewis Blind-Stitch Mach. Co. v. Arbetter Felling Mach. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1913
  4. Monitor Stove & Range Co. v. L. J. Mueller Furnace Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
  5. Williamson Heater Co. v. Monitor Stove Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. R. Clark Co. v. Murray Metal Products Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1953
  2. Bocz v. Hudson Motor Car Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API