Bahena v. Renaud
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RIMPY MEHMI BAHENA et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-291 (RDM) TRACY RENAUD, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Abel Bahena, a U.S. citizen, and his wife, Rimpy Mehmi Bahena, a citizen and national of India, bring this action pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act,
5 U.S.C. § 701
et seq., and Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, to compel the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to adjudicate their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lamont v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Aracely v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bourdon v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- McCain v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.