Legal Opinion

Bahena v. Renaud

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 6, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2021-0291Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RIMPY MEHMI BAHENA et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-291 (RDM) TRACY RENAUD, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Abel Bahena, a U.S. citizen, and his wife, Rimpy Mehmi Bahena, a citizen and national of India, bring this action pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act,

5 U.S.C. § 701

et seq., and Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, to compel the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to adjudicate their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Lamont v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  3. Aracely v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Bourdon v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. McCain v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API