Hirschmann v. Sun-Dial Optical Co.

This action in assumpsit was brought to recover compensation for the performance of a processing operation conducted on property owned by the defendant. The case was tried by a justice of the superior court sitting with a jury. At the conclusion of the trial a verdict was returned for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,942.72. The case is before us solely on the defendant's exception to the denial of its motion for a new trial.

In general the facts of the case are not substantially in dispute. It appears that in 1950 plaintiff had an agreement with defendant under which he was to process…