Cannata v. Hoag
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 CHRISTOPHER J. CANNATA, 8 No. 3:21-cv-05307-BJR-DWC 9 Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 10 RECOMMENDATION JAMES HOAG, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 This matter comes before the Court on a Report and Recommendation (“R&R,” Dkt. 37) 15 16 by the Honorable David W. Christel, U.S. Magistrate Judge, that recommends granting in part and 17 denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (“Motion” or “Mot.,” Dkt. 29), 18 dismissing sua sponte certain of Plaintiff’s claims not addressed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Herbert L. Board v. Karl Farnham, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Harper v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Berry v. PetermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.