Legal Opinion
Richardson v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 19, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-1786PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Jasmin Richardson filed suit under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., to seek review of a Hearing Officer’s determination that Defendant District of Columbia correctly concluded that her minor son, C.S., did not have a qualifying disability in 2015, despite subsequent testing that confirmed C.S. exhibits symptoms consistent with at least one disability recognized under the statute.
Before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reid Ex Rel. Reid v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Alexander Kerkam v. Floretta McKenzie Superintendent, D.C. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Elzeneiny v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Leggett v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Ehrman v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cynthia K. v. Portsmouth School DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Collette v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Herrion, Sr. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- K. v. Portsmouth School DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020