Legal Opinion

State v. Gilmore

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1942No. 4696PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Chief Justice.

The appellants (defendants) were indicted, tried, convicted and sentenced to the state penitentiary upon a charge of obtaining property exceeding the value of twenty dollars from Herman Pieper “by making false pretenses and with intent to defraud the said H. Pieper.” Upon request of appellants the following “Bill of Particulars” was furnished to them by the district attorney:

“Comes now the State of New Mexico by its District Attorney in and for the Ninth Judicial District and for a bill of particulars requested by the defendant, Sam Mersefelder, states:
“That the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  2. Berry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State v. EarleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. People v. KulandNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. State v. TannerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HooverOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. HoffmanArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. MaresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. HoffmanArizona Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API