Legal Opinion

Midvale Motors, Inc. v. Saunders

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1967No. 10626Published

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice:

Appellant, Midvale Motors, commenced this action on a uniform real estate contract alleging the default thereof by respondents, as the vendees. Midvale Motors in its complaint sought two inconsistent remedies, either of which was provided under the terms *404of the contract, i.e., recovery of the delinquent monthly payments or cancellation of the contract with an order of the court declaring a forfeiture and returning possession to the vendor.

The instant case is not an action of unlawful detainer based upon a pleading that forfeiture is an accomplished fact and that respondents…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frailey v. McGarryUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Snowflake Laundry Co. v. MacDowellWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Erisman v. OvermanUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Lindsay v. KeimigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Rogers v. United Western Minerals Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API