Midvale Motors, Inc. v. Saunders
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CALLISTER, Justice:
Appellant, Midvale Motors, commenced this action on a uniform real estate contract alleging the default thereof by respondents, as the vendees. Midvale Motors in its complaint sought two inconsistent remedies, either of which was provided under the terms *404of the contract, i.e., recovery of the delinquent monthly payments or cancellation of the contract with an order of the court declaring a forfeiture and returning possession to the vendor.
The instant case is not an action of unlawful detainer based upon a pleading that forfeiture is an accomplished fact and that respondents…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frailey v. McGarryUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Snowflake Laundry Co. v. MacDowellWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Erisman v. OvermanUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Lindsay v. KeimigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Rogers v. United Western Minerals Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1958