Legal Opinion

Carman v. Secretary of State

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1971No. 20 January Term 1971, Docket No. 53,025PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

July 15,1970 plaintiffs sought mandamus in the Court of Appeals to force submission to the electors of an allegedly initiated “Amendment to the Constitution” which, later, came to be known publicly as “Proposal C.” The writ was ultimately granted. For details, see the opinion of Division 2, released September 2 (26 Mich App 403). Upon strength of that opinion and our order denying leave entered 12 days later (384. Mich 751), the amendment proposed — and now in question — was submitted to the electors November 3 and approved by a strong majority.

The ensuing opinion should presay a cautionary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. City of Jackson v. Com'r of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Lockwood v. Commissioner of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Leininger v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State ex rel. Thompson v. WinnettNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Stand Up for Democracy v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API