Legal Opinion

Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Ransom

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1912No. 3244PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for damages; from city court of Cordele — Judge Strozier.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. The plaintiff, in her petition, asks for no damages other than vindictive damages; “the entire injury” (as alleged) “is to'the peace, happiness and feelings of the plaintiff. The verdict of a jury in such a case should not be disturbed unless the court should suspect bias or prejudice from its excess or its inadequacy.”

2. This is the third consecutive verdict for the plaintiff, upon testimony at each trial substantially identical (Ga. So. & Fla. Ry. Co. v. Ransom, 5 Ga. App. 540 (40 S. E. 525), 8 Ga. App. 277 (68 S. E. 943) ) ; the instructions of the court to the jury in the instant case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. RansomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. RansomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Butt v. StoryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API