Legal Opinion

The Bullard Company v. General Electric Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1965No. 9866_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

Its two patents 1 upon devices for control of an automatic machine tool were infringed, The Bullard Company complained to the District Court, by the General Electric Company. 2 Denying the accusation, the latter counterclaimed for a judgment declaring the patents invalid. Decision went for GE solely on non-infringement, without any declaration upon the patents. On Bullard’s appeal we affirm.

The patents comprise combination claims only. The master to whom the cause had been referred sustained the patents, and on the finding that GE’s mechanism embraced, as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
  3. Marston v. JC Penney CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
  4. Lundy Electronics & Systems, Inc. v. Optical Recognition Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
  5. Cleeton v. Hewlett-Packard CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API