Legal Opinion

Page v. Holmes-Darst Coal Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1934No. Docket No. 61, Calendar No. 37,605PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Holmes-Darst Coal Corporation of Knoxville, Tennessee, and Holmes-Darst Coal Company of the same place, are both Delaware corporations represented in Detroit by William L. Barie, their Michigan sales representative, who on behalf of Holmes-Darst Coal Company purchased a Plymouth coupe from plaintiff, giving in payment therefor its check in the sum of $583 drawn on the East Tennessee National Bank of Knoxville, Tennessee. Plaintiff at the same time purchased from defendant company a used Buick coupe, giving in exchange a check drawn by Maude Page in the sum of $225 on the First Wayne National…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Pierce v. IndsethSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Anderson v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  4. Winchester Milling Co. v. Bank of WinchesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Wooldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rezapolvi v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API