Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 8, 1946No. 34,237PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This case is here on plaintiff’s appeal from the order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint. The question for decision is whether, in an action brought in Minnesota by a person injured in Wisconsin by the negligence of the insured named in an automobile liability insurance policy containing a no-action clause issued to him at his residence in Wisconsin, the insurer is liable directly to the person injured for the negligence of the insured where the insured’s liability for negligence has not been established by a judgment recovered against him after actual trial.

Pl…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HerrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Coster v. CosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  2. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Davis v. FurlongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Travelers Insurance Co. v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
  5. Sohn v. BernsteinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API