Legal Opinion
AP Ex Rel. Peterson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 17, 2008No. 06-CV-2342 (PJS/RLE)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
The parents of plaintiff AP, a diabetic boy, sought to enroll him in a day-care program called “Adventures Plus” operated by defendant Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 (“District 11”). AP’s parents asked District 11 for various accommodations related to AP’s diabetes. AP’s parents were dissatisfied with District ll’s response and, consequently, AP never attended Adventures Plus. AP contends that District 11 discriminated against him based on his disability by refusing to grant the requested accommodations, and AP now seeks compensatory…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doucette v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Alboniga v. School Board of Broward County FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Hough v. Shakopee Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Maislin v. Tennessee State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
- A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, ISD No. 279Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.