Legal Opinion
Lanman v. Hinson
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 10, 2006No. 04-00122PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CLELAND, District Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendants’ “Motion for Summary Judgment,” filed on August 5, 2005. The matter has been fully briefed, and the court conducted a hearing on the motion on May 24, 2006. For the reasons stated below, the court will deny the motion.
I. INTRODUCTION
On February 20, 2004, Plaintiff Patricia Lanman, personal representative of the estate of Eugene H. Lanman, initiated this action asserting various causes of action related to the death of Eugene Lanman (the “decedent”) while admitted at the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DOE v. Northern Lakes Community Mental Health AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021