Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Dawdy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 4, 1984No. 4-83-0510PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trapp

The plaintiffs, Peter and Gerda Vogel, commenced an action in forcible entry and detainer on June 11, 1980, seeking possession of an 811-acre tract that they had sold to Jim and Caroline Dawdy on contract. Subsequent amendments to the complaint named as defendants Norwood and Barbara Ashley and Norman and Lula Mae Sutiles, who were subsequent purchasers of parcels subdivided by the Dawdys. The Dawdys and the Ashleys defaulted, and summary judgment was entered against them on April 25, 1983. They are not parties to the present appeal. The case against the Surtieses proceeded to a bench trial.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. West Side Trust & Savings Bank v. LopotenIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. French v. WillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Miles Homes, Inc. v. MintjalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Eddy v. KerrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Stillman v. PalisIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Suttles v. VogelIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Vogel v. DawdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Nance v. BellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. DominickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Suttles v. VogelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API