Legal Opinion

Nance v. Bell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 8, 1991No. 2-90-0651PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

The defendant, James O. Bell, appeals from the judgment entered in the circuit court of Winnebago County in favor of the plaintiff, Henry L. Nance, granting possession of real estate located in Rockford, Illinois, to the plaintiff. The defendant argues on appeal that the plaintiff failed to make a proper demand for possession required under section 9 — 102(a)(5) of the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 110, par. 9 — 102(a)(5)) and, therefore, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiff's action for forcible entry and detainer.

On January 22,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Avdich v. KleinertIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. West Side Trust & Savings Bank v. LopotenIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Vogel v. DawdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. First National Bank of Evergreen Park v. Chrysler Realty Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Eddy v. KerrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Management Consultant, LLC v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Russell v. HoweAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. BURNHAM MANAGEMENT CO. v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Figueroa v. DeaconAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Goodwin v. MatthewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API