Cua v. Ramos

BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Plaintiff-appellant Rosita L. Cua appeals a judgment in favor of defendants-appel-lees Virginia G. Ramos and Bias Davila, claiming: trial court error in entering judgment on the evidence as to an implied right of action (Count I); and, as to a libel action (Count II), error in admitting or excluding evidence, in giving or refusing instructions, and in ruling on numerous questions of procedure.

We reverse and remand for a new trial.

*1165FACTS

On February 15, 1976 Cua was appointed to the position of psychiatrist at Central State Hospital. At the time Ramos also was a…