Legal Opinion

Freeman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 1, 2009No. PD-0356-09PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant was stopped for a traffic violation and was ultimately arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated. At trial, it came to light that the police videotape of appellant’s stop and field sobriety tests was recorded over. At the close of evidence, appellant requested a spoliation instruction regarding the missing tape. Appellant did not cite any constitutional authority in support of his requested instruction. The State argued that the federal standard under Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 109 S.Ct. 333, 102 L.Ed.2d 281 (1988), applied. The requested instruction was…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pena v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Brooks Edward Payne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  3. Brooks Edward Payne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  4. Brooks Edward Payne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  5. Freeman, Steven DouglasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API