Hoke v. Brown

OPINION

ARMIJO, Judge.

By action for unlawful detainer, appellees recovered possession of real property from and were awarded damages against appellants.

Appellants claim the trial cotirt erred because one of the findings made was not supported by substantial evidence and because of failure to adopt requested findings favorable to them.

The trial court found that at all times material to the action appellees were the owners of the real estate in question and appellants occupied such premises against the will of appellees and refused to vacate following notice to quit.

Appellants challenge the…