Co-Con, Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1DissentSutin, Judge
I dissent.
I dissent on Point 1, which affirms the Decision and Order of the Commissioner with respect to gross receipts on leases. The Commissioner’s written Decision and Order is (1) arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion; (2) not supported by substantial evidence in the record; and (3) not in accordance with law. Section 72-13-39(D), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 10, pt. 2, 1973 Supp.).(1) To find an equipment leasing arrangement between Universal and Co-Con disregards equitable principles and strains the public conscience.
The Commissioner’s Decision and Order made the following…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Pugh v. PhelpsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
- First Nat. Bank in Albuquerque v. TanneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- Hoke v. BrownNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968