Legal Opinion

Holiday Casuals v. M. Beckerman & Sons, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 8, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

In this trade-mark opposition proceeding, the Examiner-in-Chief, acting for the Commissioner of Patents, reversed the Examiner of Interferences, and held that the marks “Happy Debs” and “Hon-eydebs,” when applied to substantially identical goods, women's and'Children’s footwear, were not confusingly similar. The mark sought to be registered is “Happy Debs,” application serial No. 600,806, filed July 18, 1950, under the Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1051 et seq. Opposer is the owner of the marks, “Hol-idebs,” registration No. 418,707, dated January 8,1946, and “Honeydebs,”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eureka Williams Corp. v. McCorquodaleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. Coty, Inc. v. Perfumes Habana, S. A.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. McKinnon & Co. v. Hyvis Oils, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  4. Continental Coffee Co., Inc. v. Continental Foods, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. Sure-Fit Products Company v. Saltzson Drapery CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API