Legal Opinion

Eureka Williams Corp. v. McCorquodale

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 3, 1953No. Patent Appeal 5917PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

The appellee has sought to register “Ilotomatie” as a trade mark in connection with the sale of automatic gas water *156heaters, establishing continuous use thereof since 1928. In opposition, the appellant has set forth his prior registrations, and antedating usage since 1920 of the mark, “Oil-O-Matic” as applied to liquid fuel burning devices and automatic electrically controlled and operated fuel heating systems.

It being stipulated that the products above mentioned possess the same descriptive properties, appellant contends that the respective marks are confusingly similar and thus,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Eureka Williams Corp. v. Willoughby MacH. & Tool Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  3. Kensington Steel Co. v. Nichols Engineering & Research Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  4. Kanmak Textiles, Inc. v. Carnac, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Anita Dembiczak and Benson ZinbargCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. Carman Industries, Inc. v. Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re Advertising & Marketing Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re Dr Pepper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. In re DuboisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API