Legal Opinion

McCord v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 19, 2017No. 16-310CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keywords: Tucker Act; 28 U.S.C. § 1491; Military Disability Pay; Army Board for Correction of Military Records; Integrated Disability Evaluation System; Joint Pilot Program; Remand.

OPINION AND ORDER

KAPLAN, Judge.

Plaintiff Preston McCord served in the United States Army from 2008 through 2012. While in the Army, he injured his lower back. He was later evaluated for possible disability retirement through a joint Department of Defense/Department of Veterans Affairs disability evaluation program which was then being piloted. As part of that program, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  2. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  3. McCadney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  4. McCord v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Sissel v. EsperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API