Legal Opinion
Victor Parsons v. Charles Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 21, 2015No. 13-16396PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The panel voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc; the petition was subsequently withdrawn. The full court was so notified.
A judge then requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
Judge Ikuta’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc is filed concurrently with this Order.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
2DissentIkuta, Circuit Judge, joined by Kozinski, O’Scannlain, Callahan, Bea, and M. Smith, Circuit Judges,
The Supreme Court has established two straightforward principles that are applicable to this appeal. First, before…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Andrew Teter v. Anne E. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Jesus Perez GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- XIRUM v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE)District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024