Christy v. Pilkinton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
This is a suit for specific performance, brought by the appellee as vendor in a contract for the sale of real property. In appealing from a decree for the plaintiff the defendants contend only that the court erred in ordering them to perform a promise which, the proof shows to be beyond their financial resources.
It is conceded that the parties executed a valid written contract by which the Christys agreed to buy an apartment house from Mrs. Pilkinton for $30,000. The vendor’s title is admittedly good. "When the time came for performance the purchasers, although not insolvent, were unable to…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Courtyard Gardens Health & Rehabilitation, LLC v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Fazzio v. MasonIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Arkansas Realtors Ass'n v. Real Forms, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Baldi Construction Engineering, Inc. v. Wheel Awhile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.