Legal Opinion

Christy v. Pilkinton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 20, 1954No. 5-557PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a suit for specific performance, brought by the appellee as vendor in a contract for the sale of real property. In appealing from a decree for the plaintiff the defendants contend only that the court erred in ordering them to perform a promise which, the proof shows to be beyond their financial resources.

It is conceded that the parties executed a valid written contract by which the Christys agreed to buy an apartment house from Mrs. Pilkinton for $30,000. The vendor’s title is admittedly good. "When the time came for performance the purchasers, although not insolvent, were unable to…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Courtyard Gardens Health & Rehabilitation, LLC v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Fazzio v. MasonIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Arkansas Realtors Ass'n v. Real Forms, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Baldi Construction Engineering, Inc. v. Wheel Awhile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API