Legal Opinion

Shearer v. Field

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action to redeem from a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtRumsey, J.

It is undisputed that the defendant is in possession of these premises, claiming as a purchaser at a sale under a judgment of foreclosure* of what is known as the Briggs mortgage. It is also undisputed that the four and one-half acres of which the plaintiff claims to he. the owner, was subject to the lien of that mortgage; that it was owned by one Barney Welch, who was in possession at the time of the foreclosure of the Briggs mortgage, and that Welch had given a mortgage upon that parcel of land which was subsequent to the Briggs mortgage. It is undisputed, too, that this subsequent mortgage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burlen v. ShannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. House v. . LockwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Benedict v. Gilman & CouchNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  4. Board of Supervisors v. Mineral Point RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Caperton v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rowland v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of WelchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1908
  3. Stehli v. Town of Oyster BayNew York Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API