Shearer v. Field
New York Supreme Court
Action to redeem from a mortgage.
1Opinion of the CourtRumsey, J.
It is undisputed that the defendant is in possession of these premises, claiming as a purchaser at a sale under a judgment of foreclosure* of what is known as the Briggs mortgage. It is also undisputed that the four and one-half acres of which the plaintiff claims to he. the owner, was subject to the lien of that mortgage; that it was owned by one Barney Welch, who was in possession at the time of the foreclosure of the Briggs mortgage, and that Welch had given a mortgage upon that parcel of land which was subsequent to the Briggs mortgage. It is undisputed, too, that this subsequent mortgage…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burlen v. ShannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- House v. . LockwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Benedict v. Gilman & CouchNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Board of Supervisors v. Mineral Point RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Caperton v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rowland v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of WelchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1908
- Stehli v. Town of Oyster BayNew York Supreme Court · 1920