Legal Opinion

Bunge v. Kirchhoff

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 20, 1928No. Gen. No. 7,802PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jett

In an action of assumpsit brought by E. J. Bunge, appellant, to recover the purchase price for 25 shares of stock of the Chicago Manifold Company and attorney fees, under the Illinois Securities Act, Cahill’s St. ch. 32, 254 et seq., a jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendants, appellees here, upon which judgment was entered and the appellant brings the record to this court, for review, by appeal.

For the purposes of this opinion appellant will be called “plaintiff” and appellees, “defendants.”

The first count of the amended declaration charges that the stock in question was a Class…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Handley v. DrumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  3. Piot v. ChartrandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Midwest Management Corp. v. StephensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Hudson v. SilverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  4. Patteson v. City of PeoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  5. Schlossberg v. Chicago Dr. Pepper Bottling Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API