Wilson v. Daniel International Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Brailsford, Justice:
The sole issue on this appeal is whether an employee of a ready-mixed concrete supplier, who, while making a delivery of concrete on a job site, was injured by the negligence of an employee of the general contractor, may sue in tort for his injuries. The answer depends upon whether the concrete company is to be regarded as a supplier of material or as a subcontractor engaged in the execution or performance of part of the work undertaken by the contractor, within the meaning of Section 72-112, Code of 1962. If the latter, the injured employee is confined to his remedy under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldstein v. Acme Concrete CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Hipp v. Sadler Materials Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1971
- Bendure v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Whitaker v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Pyett v. Marsh Plywood Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Harrell v. Pineland Plantation, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Hammock v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Sallie Zeigler v. Eastman Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Meyer v. Piggly Wiggly No. 24, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Davis v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.