Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1995No. 66212PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We reverse and remand.

On June 17, 1993, movant was indicted in cause No. 93CR-001396 for stealing $150 or more, § 570.030, RSMo 1986. On July 23, 1993, movant was again indicted in cause No. 93CR-003384 for Count I — stealing a credit card, § 570.030, RSMo 1986; Count II— stealing $150 or more, § 570.030, RSMo 1986; and Count III — resisting arrest, § 575.150, RSMo 1986. Movant pled guilty to all four counts. The court sentenced mov-ant as a persistent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Lestourgeon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. McCoo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marschke v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Roth v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Gladden v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Burgin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Griham v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API