State Ex Rel. Mooney v. Consolidated School District No. 3
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUARK, Judge.
This is an action in the nature of quo warranto. Relators, who are appellants, claim to be taxpaying citizens of Common School District No'. 2 of Dunklin County and charge by the information filed as follows: On March 19, 1953, a special election was held under the provisions of section 165.300, RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., for the purpose of annexing said Common School District No. 2 (called Slicer District) to Consolidated District No. 3 of Stoddard County (called Bernie), which proposition' wás defeated. In April 1953 a special election was held under the provisions of sec. 165.300…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State ex rel. Rose v. JobSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Spiking School District No. 71 v. Purported "Enlarged School District R-IISupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- State v. HawkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Peter v. KaufmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- State v. ColliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Miller v. Plains Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Gover v. ClevelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Hoevelman v. Reorganized School District R2 of Crawford CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Keeshan v. Embassy Investment CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Philipp Transit Lines, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.