Legal Opinion
In Re ITT Corp. Derivative Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 8, 2009No. 07-CV-2878 (CS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SEIBEL, District Judge.
Before the Court are (1) Nominal Defendant ITT Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Verified Consolidated Complaint (“Third Amended Complaint”) filed on March 17, 2009, (Doc. 41); (2) the Motion of Raymond W. LeBoeuf, Frank T. Maclnnis, Linda S. Sanford, Markos I. Tambakeras, Steven R. Loranger, Curtis J. Crawford, Christina A. Gold, Ralph F. Hake, and John J. Harare (“Director Defendants”) to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint, filed on March 17, 2009, (Doc. 58); and (3) the Special Litigation Committee’s Motion to Terminate…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Stone v. RitterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
- In Re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morefield v. BaileyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Ball v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- King v. PlankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Spizz v. EluzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020