Legal Opinion · Dissent

Casa El Sol-Acapulco, S.A. v. Fontenot

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided May 2, 1996No. 14-92-01345-CVPublished

1Dissent

SEARS, Justice (Assigned),

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

The basic mistake in the majority opinion is the finding that the option agreement was a unilateral contract. This is contrary to the facts, the conclusion of law reached by the trial court, and the existing case law of Texas.

The facts show there were several lawsuits pending between these parties which were all compromised and settled by the simultaneous execution of 37 documents. Therefore, the option agreement was only one of 37 documents which the parties executed in order to fully settle all their disputes. These documents are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allright, Inc. v. PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Vawter v. GarveyTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Jones v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. County of Burleson v. General Electric Capital Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API