Legal Opinion
Surti v. G.D. Searle & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 29, 1996No. 95 C 5204PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Eufremia Surti brings this action against defendant G.D. Searle & Company, claiming that Searle discriminated against her on the basis of her age and national origin in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., by failing to promote her to the position of Cash Accountant in 1994. Presently before the Court is Searle’s motion for summary judgment in its favor.
RELEVANT FACTS
The following…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ragland v. Rock-Tenn Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Madiebo v. Division of Medicaid/State of MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997
- Mmubango v. LeavittDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- SAVINO, DO v. INDIANA URGENT CARE PHYSICIAN GROUP, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021