Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Hill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1970No. Nos. 69-121 and 69-122PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

At the outset, it should be noted that the allegation of denial of counsel (and the admission thereof for purposes of the demurrer) removes from these cases *126the question of res judicata, decided in State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 175, 226 N. E. 2d 104. It is also clear that the offense with which appellees were charged was such that they had a right to ‘ ‘ appear and defend in person and with counsel.” Section 10, Article I of the Constitution of Ohio. Therefore, the sole question before us is whether Sections 2953.21 to 2953.24, inclusive, Revised Code, referred to as the Post…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Case v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Young v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HesterOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Van Hook v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
  3. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. LototskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. State v. JulianoOhio Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API