Legal Opinion

Heller v. Goldsmith

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided June 30, 1930No. 125Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hargest, P. J.,

The plaintiff filed a prsecipe for judgment by virtue of a supposed authority given in a lease for certain premises in the Borough of Steelton, which lease was dated Sept. 14, 1922, and was for a term of one year, with a privilege of renewal. Execution was issued thereon. On Feb. 27, 1924, petitions were filed, upon which rules were granted; .one to show cause why judgment should not be stricken off, and the other, to show cause why it should not be opened. These rules were duly answered. The case was put on the argument list at the June Term, 1925, and, again, *747at the October…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Potter Title & Trust Co. v. FrankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Whitney v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Markofski v. YanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Moving Picture Co. of America v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Paxson & Comfort Co. v. PotterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API