Legal Opinion

People v. Vandover

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 2012PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

In determining probable cause, the standard to be applied is that it must “appear to be at least more probable than not that a crime has taken place and that the one arrested is its perpetrator, for conduct equally compatible with guilt or innocence will not suffice” (People v Carrasquillo, 54 NY2d 248, 254 [1981]). Applying this standard, there is support in the record for the Appellate Term’s determination that the facts did not support probable cause to arrest defendant. That determination, based on a mixed question of law and fact, is beyond our further…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. CarrasquilloNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. OmowaleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. GomcinNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. People v. MoffittCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2015
  3. People v. DelvillartronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. BarnetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. People v. HogueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API