Legal Opinion

Austin v. City of San Antonio & Urban Renewal Agency

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 17, 1982No. 16709PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLARK, Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for writ of mandamus.

Petitioner, an attorney, requested information from the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of San Antonio under the authority of Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. 6252-17a (Supp. 1980), the Texas Open Records Act. When the agency refused his request, petitioner filed an application for writ of mandamus in the district court, seeking to compel the City of San Antonio to disclose the information. The agency, a creature of statute, was allowed to intervene. 1 The trial court denied the application after an evidentiary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Brown v. RuseTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Pickard v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Triton Insurance Company v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning NewsTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning News, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
  3. Texas Department of Public Safety v. GilbreathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Esperanza Peace and Justice Ctr. v. City of San AntonioDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2001
  5. Espinoza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API