Fort Pitt Stamping & Enameling Co. v. American Natural Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 189, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1920, No. 1659, for plaintiff on case-stated, in suit of Port Pitt Stamping & Enameling Co. v. American Natural Gas Co. Case-stated in ejectment for land in Borough of Leech-burg. Before Shaper,. P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court entered judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was judgment, quoting it.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Moschzisker,
This is a case-stated, wherein the facts agreed upon are as follows: On May 15, 1897, a limited partnership association owned in fee simple the real estate here in controversy, situate in Armstrong County, this State; *164on that day, by deed duly recorded, the receivers of this partnership conveyed the premises to “H. G. Wasson, Trustee, his successors, heirs and assigns”; this deed, which is made part of the case-stated, shows through its various parts, the designation of the grantee just quoted, and recites that the conveyance is made in fulfillment of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. DurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- G.L. P.J.R.R. Co. v. . N.Y. G.L.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Mercantile National Bank of Cleveland v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- S. A. Loux & Son v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Berks County v. PileSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Yorktowne Paper Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- McCall v. UmbenhauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Kyle v. HibbsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Welch v. HarriganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922