Legal Opinion

Kyle v. Hibbs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1924No. Appeals, 62 to 65PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

These two actions of ejectment, raising the same question, and therefore considered together, as they were in the court below, involve the right of the plaintiff, Kyle, to recover a part of certain coal lands, the title to which he insists was secured by virtue of a sheriff’s deed, bearing date March 9, 1920. It therefore becomes necessary to determine the interest of the execution debtor claimed to have been acquired. On June 14,1901, an agreement or declaration of trust was entered into between Hibbs, Higinbotham and Joseph R. Barnes, providing that title should…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flitcraft v. Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Hamnett v. Monongahela Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Steacy v. RiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  4. Fort Pitt Stamping & Enameling Co. v. American Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. McMahan v. McMahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harlan v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. Stewart v. CummingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. C. I. T. Corp. v. Flint, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1938
  5. Osborne v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API