Commonwealth v. Cannon
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from judgments of sentence for attempted burglary and criminal trespass. Appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain either of his convictions. We have concluded that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction of attempted burglary, but insufficient to sustain the conviction of criminal trespass. We therefore affirm the judgment of sentence for attempted burglary and vacate the judgment of sentence for criminal trespass. 1
In deciding the sufficiency of evidence, we must first accept as true all the evidence upon which the trier of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. MadisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. PetriskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. EbertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GalindesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. HaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. PalagoniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.