Legal Opinion

Marta v. Nepa

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 11, 1978PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

In this action for a real estate broker’s commission, the defendants appeal from the Superior Court’s judgment that a commission is owed to the plaintiff; the plaintiff cross-appeals from the Court’s judgment as to the nature of the damages.

I

In 1969, the defendant, Albert Marta, in trying to locate tenants for a shopping center that he and his wife were constructing, discussed with the plaintiff’s testator, Leonard A. Nepa, the difficulty of finding a large department store as a tenant. Whether Marta authorized or agreed to pay Nepa to find such tenant was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  2. Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bellanca Corporation v. BellancaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Application of Delaware Racing Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
  5. Drake v. BlockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Weichert Co. Realtors v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  3. Nepa v. MartaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. Merle Wood & Associates, Inc. v. Trinity Yachts, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
  5. Ham v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API