Legal Opinion
Outlaw Lab., LP v. Shenoor Enter., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided March 4, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-2299-BPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JANE J. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
*358Outlaw is a manufacturer of male dietary supplements, the Tristeel Products. Outlaw has sued convenience stores because they "advertise and offer for sale" competing male dietary supplements, the Rhino Products. Outlaw alleges that these retailers have committed false advertising under the Lanham Act because they disseminate false statements through the sale of the Rhino Products; specifically, the Rhino Products are labeled "all natural" and state they contain "no harmful synthetic chemicals." Outlaw alleges that these labels are false because Rhino…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allied World National Assurance Company v. NHC, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2025
- Ariix LLC v. USANA Health SciencesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
- Cunningham v. Matrix Financial Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
- Doe v. San Jose Unified School District BoardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Estate of Peter Goudreau, through its Administrator Jeffrey Goudreau v. Estate of Linda Faye Goudreau, through its Administrator Claudia HollandDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.