Legal Opinion

Concord Oil Co. v. Alco Oil and Gas Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1965No. A-10041PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING ■

GRIFFIN, Justice.

The opinion heretofore rendered by this Court is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor:

*636Respondent, Aleo, filed this suit in a district court of Bexar County,. Texas, to recover from Concord the sum of $23,000.00 which Aleo had paid Concord by virtue of a written contract between the parties.

Concord filed a cross action for damages because it alleged Aleo had not carried out the terms of the contract, but had defaulted thereon. Concord contended as a defense to Alco’s suit, that it had performed the contract, except in so far as Aleo had…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Weinstein v. National Bank of JeffersonTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Fifth National Bank v. Iron City National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Fitch v. LomaxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Schwarz v. National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1887

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Bocanegra v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Barfield v. Howard M. Smith Company of AmarilloTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In the Matter of Texas Mortgage Services Corporation, Debtor. Texas Mortgage Services Corporation v. Guadalupe Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Doncaster v. Hernaiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
  5. Petroleum Anchor Equipment, Inc. v. TyraTexas Supreme Court · 1967

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API